NRI Party in Person direct from USA (Ph: 9873540498) suggests NRI 498a Helpline by NRI Party

  
Writer Updated 2 years ago
Language English Reads 116
Genre

Business & Money

Curated

information
This ebook was rated by curators selected by the Widbook team.
Published Dec 03, 2016 Popular

Status Writing

Who liked NRI Party in Person direct from USA (Ph: 9873540498) suggests NRI 498a Helpline

Who has NRI Party in Person direct from USA (Ph: 9873540498) suggests NRI 498a Helpline on the Collection

NRI Party in Person direct from USA (Ph: 9873540498) suggests NRI 498a Helpline's Timeline

NRI Party in Person direct from USA (Ph: 9873540498) suggests NRI 498a Helpline A non resident Indian can be subjected to human rights violation of NRI & hence a NRI must remember his following human rights viz., That right to fair trial in judicial proceedings whether civil or criminal is a human right explained in below paras. and that fair trial includes pre-trial stage in the judicial proceedings as this stage determines whether the matter is triable or not or whether there is any abuse of court or not. Interestingly, my applications already on record mentions non-triability, perjury, unethical practices, fraud on court & lot more facts & circumstances which will prove that this is not just my human rights violation but this is also a classic real-life example of scandalization within family courts @ XYZ Courts vis-à-vis Delhi District Courts (or the name of the state concerned). If any help needed then please contact:- man cell delhi is available 24 hours at our permanent email id aturchatur(at)yahoo(dot)com moblie :- +91-9873540498 email:- aturchatur@yahoo.com web:- http://nri498ahelpline.com HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION of NRI That if the court case is proceeded without following the principles of good faith then it is the violation of my human rights. That when the matter is not even triable as per my three applications filed by me alongwith WS itself & if the matter is put to trial without deciding my applications then this is against the principles of good faith hence my human rights violation. That if unethical practices vis-a-vis court record tampering has taken place within the above HMA to suppress my three applications filed by me alongwith WS itself then this is fraud on court & this is also my human rights violation. That this protection against getting a trial is fully consistent with human rights law because human rights law prohibits putting people on trial when there is no crime to try them for. Hence putting the above noted “DIVORCE” on ex-parte evidence on very first instance by Hon’ble Principal Judge concerned without even perusing the respondent’s submissions viz., Written Statement, applications, counter objections, perjury, fraud on court, unethical practices or even predecessor judge’s order sheets violates the human rights & thereby the Hon’ble Principal Judge started gifting illegal favors to the petitioner/ wife for the reasons best known to him only & this is wrong not just morally, but this wrong also socially, technically, legally (Lego-Technical Fallacy) & also my human rights violation and hence I vehemently raise my written objection in this regard & seek enquiry & investigation by the Hon’ble High Court to understand & disclose the true reasons & true motive behind such illegal favors which have resulted also in my human rights violation hereinafter referred as HRV for brevity. That the right to equality before the law is sometimes regarded as part of the right to a fair trial. The right entitles individuals to be recognized as subject, not as object, of the law. International human rights law permits no derogation or exceptions to this human right. That it is a settled proposition that, "Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.” And those acts (explained above & within this entire complaint) by the Hon’ble Principal Judge proofs his dependent & partial attitude which on one hand is non est in the eyes of law & on the other hand attracts provisions of Lego-technical fallacy hence all such acts are also void in the eyes of law. That the aim of this right is to ensure the proper administration of justice. As a minimum the right to fair trial includes the following fair trial rights in civil and criminal proceedings: the right to be heard by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal the right to a public hearing the right to be heard within a reasonable time the right to counsel the right to interpretation That "All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the determination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law." That in this regard it can be seen that the Hon’ble Principal Judge has offered illegal favors to the petitioner/ wife which is not just against the principles of good faith & human rights but such an act is also termed as unbecoming of a judicial officer (read with explanations in entire complaint not being repeated for brevity.) That the European Court of Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights have clarified that the right to a fair trial applies to all types of judicial proceedings, whether civil and criminal. According to the European Court of Human Rights, Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the fair trial rights apply to all civil rights and obligations created under domestic law and therefore to all civil proceedings. That as per the definition, Human rights are norms that help to protect all people everywhere from severe political, legal, and social abuses. Examples of human rights are the right to freedom of religion, the right to a fair trial when charged with a crime, the right not to be tortured, and the right to engage in political activity. That Human rights have high-priority. Maurice Cranston held that human rights are matters of “paramount importance” and their violation “a grave affront to justice” (Cranston 1967). If human rights did not have high priority they would not have the ability to compete with other powerful considerations such as national stability and security, individual and national self-determination, and national and global prosperity. That as per Article 1 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (hereinafter UNUDHR for brevity) "All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights." And in India in April 2014 (sometime around 15th April’2014) LGBT Community was recognized as a third gender in India & as per Supreme Court of India it is mandatory to include LGBT within the forms & also some authorities have been ordered to make separate toilets for LGBT so if after passage of LGBT if any judicial officer defies all lego-technicalities in the very first hearing before him and offers illegal favors to one of the genders then this is a serious issue besides being my HRV. That as per Article 7 of UNUDHR "All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.” And this law was made even before LGBT were recognized in India and now since for the past two years approx one more gender has been recognized in India & despite being three broad genders categorized in India if a senior rank judicial officer does any gender discrimination or offers illegal favors to one of the genders in a civil suit/ petition vis-à-vis matrimonial dispute in a family matter (read with entire complaint especially those paras related to Hon’ble Principal Judge) then this attracts penalties under human rights violation too both at the national level & at the international level. I vehemently raise my voice vis-à-vis my written objection to this violation of my Human rights in the hands of Principal Judge. That as per Article 8 of UNUDHR "Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law." That as per Article 12 of UNUDHR "No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks." That Some human rights are said to be "inalienable rights". The term inalienable rights (or unalienable rights) refers to "a set of human rights that are fundamental, are not awarded by human power, and cannot be surrendered." That Human rights violations occur when actions by state (or non-state) actors abuse, ignore, or deny basic human rights (including civil, political, cultural, social, and economic rights). NRI 498a Helpline are the rights which a NRI male victim of false cases by NRI wife or by Indian wife can exercise including the human rights. If any help needed then please contact:- man cell delhi is available 24 hours at our permanent email id aturchatur(at)yahoo(dot)com moblie :- +91-9873540498 email:- aturchatur@yahoo.com web:- http://humanrightsofnri.com
December 3, 2016 at 15:02