perjury 340 crpc (9873540498) man cell in delhi by Perjury Cell

  
Writer Updated 2 years ago
Language English Reads 29
Genre

Educational

Curated

information
This ebook was rated by curators selected by the Widbook team.
Published Jan 23, 2016 Popular

Status Writing

Who liked perjury 340 crpc (9873540498) man cell in delhi

Who has perjury 340 crpc (9873540498) man cell in delhi on the Collection

perjury 340 crpc (9873540498) man cell in delhi's Timeline

perjury 340 crpc (9873540498) man cell in delhi If any help needed then please contact:- man cell delhi is available 24 hours at our permanent email id aturchatur(at)yahoo(dot)com moblie :- +91-9873540498 email:- aturchatur@yahoo.com web:- http://perjury340.blogspot.in/ decide perjury first application after you file perjury application is the best tool to pressing the charges of perjury against the opposite party in a court case if wife lies about her job or simply mentions that her birthday was never celebrated in the matrimonial home & you have pictures to prove her cutting her own birthday cake in the matrimnial home then this is a typical example of perjury & this if read with section 200 can lead to imprisonment of your wife speaking lie before the court of law. Syed Nazim Husain Judgment from Allahabad High Court is the best judgment besides there are many supreme court judgments too but this one works well for family courts. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow Writ Petition No. (M/S) of 2002 Syed Nazim Husain vs. The Additional Principal Judge Family Court & another Hon’ble A. Mateen, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A. Since a very trivial point is involved I propose to dispose of the petition at this initial stage. Learned counsel for the petitioner has approached this Court with the prayer that the order dated 24.10.2002 be quashed. From the order dated 24.10.2002 it comes out that the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court on the application, moved by the petioner under Section 340, 344 Cr.P.C. instead of disposing of the same had postponed disposal of the said application and ordered that said application may be disposed of after evidence is recorded in case No. 566/89. In my view, if an application is moved in the pending case bringing to the notice of the court that any false evidence knowing well has been filed or fabricated in such proceedings, the court should dispose of the said application first before proceeding any further or before recording of further evidence. In the circumstances, I dispose of the present application and direct the Additional Principal Judge Family Court to dispose of the application so moved by the petitioner under Section 340, 344 Cr.P.C. before proceeding further in accordance with law. With the above observations the petition is disposed of finally. 9.1.2003 sd- A.Mateen If any help needed then please contact:- man cell delhi is available 24 hours at our permanent email id aturchatur(at)yahoo(dot)com moblie :- +91-9873540498 email:- aturchatur@yahoo.com web:- http://perjury340.blogspot.in/
January 23, 2016 at 15:59